The Influence of Islands



next up previous
Next: Real wires with Up: Conductance and conductance fluctuations Previous: The Influence of

The Influence of Islands

  The effects of the strong scattering centers (i.e. islands) in the bulk of the quantum wire are examined for the case of an otherwise perfect wire with islands for the system geometry shown in Fig. 6. As in the case of rough boundaries we consider the conductance of individual samples as well as the average conductance as a function of energy or wire length.

  
Figure 6: as a function of energy for a single sample of perfect quantum wire (width ) with island disorder, for different wire lengths: , , , and . Island concentration is . Also is presented conductance for perfect constriction of length and width . The top figure shows the geometry of the system.

The conductance of a single sample of a quantum wire with islands is shown in Fig. 6. Even a small concentration of islands causes an almost complete suppression of the conductance quantization. In Fig. 6 one can compare the results for a quantum wire of length with island concentration (which means only two islands at random positions) with the conductance for a perfect wire of length . Island disorder reduces the conductance in a similar way in each subband. In the mesoscopic regime, where (examples and in Fig. 6), the conductance fluctuates as a function of energy. These fluctuations are of the order . This is a quantum interference effect in which the scale of the sensitivity to changes in the energy depends on the length of the wire. We estimate that this dependence is of the form , i.e. similar to UCF, and differs from that of the fluctuations in the quantum wire with rough boundaries. is the change of the Fermi energy needed to modify the relevant phase differences across the sample by about . The fluctuation of the conductance between different samples is also of order . In the strong localization regime (e.g. case in Fig.6) the conductance is reduced to a set of peaks of maximum amplitude . Each peak corresponds to the occurrence of resonant tunnelling through the wire. The localization length generally increases as energy grows and therefore the peaks get higher towards the center of the band.

  
Figure 7: Energy dependence of the average conductance and conductance fluctuations of perfect wire with islands. Wire lengths are: . Island concentration is , and wire width is . Number of samples taken for calculating average values is N. The universal value for UCF of quasi-1D metallic wires is marked by a horizontal line.

The average conductance for the case of bulk (island) disorder is shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 9. This type of disorder has a similar effect on each subband, unlike the case of edge roughness where higher subbands are more affected then lower ones. The average conductance as a function of energy exhibits local maxima near the energies of the subband edges of the perfect wire (Figures 7 and 8). This becomes more obvious for the smaller concentrations of islands (e.g. the island concentrations are in the case presented in Fig. 7 and in Fig. 8).

  
Figure 8: and for a perfect wire with island concentration . Steps represent the conductance for the case of perfect wire. (Note the different units for and fluctuations.) The histogram of the (rescaled) DOS for this wire is also shown.

  
Figure 9: Average conductance as a function of wire length for perfect wire with islands (concentration ) for energies and - upper figure. The corresponding conductance fluctuations are shown in the lower figure. Number of samples is , and .

The behavior of the average conductance of a disordered quantum wire modelled by the (Anderson) Hamiltonian with a uniform distribution for the site energies of the wire (Masek and Kramer 1989) is, to some extent, similar. Although the general appearance of the curves differs (for the strong-scattering regime it looks like a line with peaks, whereas for the Anderson model it looks like a line with dips), in both cases the DOS is connected to in the same way. Electron scattering is proportional to the number of available states into which an electron can be scattered, i.e. to the DOS. Therefore the electron mobility and conductance should decrease when the DOS increases and vice versa, see Fig. 8.

The average conductance decreases exponentially with the length of the wire, see Fig. 9, which is the expected behavior for the localized states. The slope of the line for long wires determines the localization length for any energy, as defined by the Eq. (18).

The conductance fluctuations first increase in the quasi-ballistic regime (Fig. 9), go through a maximum in the region and then decrease as the length of the wire increases. The decrease is slower for energies with longer localization lengths. A short region of lengths, where fluctuations are almost independent of the wire length, can be observed for the energies and . The level of the fluctuations in this universal region depends on energy and it is not, in general, equal to UCF value for quasi-1D metallic systems. However, by chance we have found a case (that is in Fig. 9) where . The conductance fluctuations (Fig. 7) increase with the energy and tend to a sort of asymptotical value. This value is close to the UCF constant for wires with lengths inside the region , and decreases as the wire lengths move out of this region.



next up previous
Next: Real wires with Up: Conductance and conductance fluctuations Previous: The Influence of



Angus MacKinnon
Fri Nov 18 13:59:27 gmt 1994